|

ProjectGlobal Clinical Trials Analysis Client Top 5 Multinational Pharmaceutical Company Description VOI was contracted to explore the suitability of 30 countries as locations for global clinical trials with five compounds aimed at diseases in the oncology, endocrinology, rheumatology, nephrology and dermatology fields. The majority of countries with meaningful abilities to conduct clinical research were included in the evaluation set. These ranged from major research centers such as the U.S., France, Germany and Australia to countries with emerging clinical trial infrastructures, such as China, India, Brazil, Russia and South Africa.
Extensive primary and secondary research was conducted to determine the characteristics of each market that might affect clinical trial enrollment. First, we evaluated the structural environment for clinical research in each country. Factors considered in this phase included: nature of regulatory system, length of time required to obtain approval for trial initiation, motivations and incentives for physicians and patients to participate, cultural attitudes toward clinical trials and availability of the necessary human and technical resources.
Next, we collected disease-specific information in each country. For example, we examined epidemiological data, including incidence and prevalence statistics and the percentage of patients meeting the enrollment criteria for each trial. We also determined diagnostic pathways, the number of specialists treating the disease, the number of contacts each patient would have with investigators, investigators’ attitudes toward or prior experience with the therapeutic category and the likelihood that patients would enroll in the trials.
Using the findings from this extensive analysis, we constructed patient enrollment models to forecast recruitment schedules in the individual country and overall trial levels. Probability-based (Monte Carlo) forecasting techniques were applied to these models to determine the likelihood of meeting enrollment objectives on schedule in each country.
Results Our client was able to consolidate the trials in a substantially smaller number of countries than originally planned. By eliminating countries with a low probability of meeting clinical trial enrollment goals on schedule and concentrating trial activity in countries with a high likelihood of successful enrollment, our client was able to reduce the cost of each trial by 10% to 20% — the cumulative savings across all five clinical trials was measured in the tens of millions of dollars. This was done without jeopardizing the overall probability of on-time trial enrollment.
ProjectAsia-Pacific Clinical Trials Strategic Development Plan Client Major CRO / National Clinical Trials Research Coordinating Agency Description: In conjunction with a leading clinical trials research organization, VOI Consulting developed a program to improve a country’s competitiveness in global clinical trials relative to other locations in the Asia-Pacific region. This included a thorough capabilities analysis of our client and nine competitive countries. Among the factors considered were biomedical infrastructures, efficiency of trial approval procedures at the regulatory, institutional and ethical review levels, relative clinical research experience levels in various therapeutic categories, degree and type of government support, patient enrollment attitudes, and variations in medical practices.
Findings from the capabilities research phase were matched to an analysis of the needs of multinational clinical trial sponsors to develop a SWOT for the client country’s clinical trials research development efforts. At completion of the project, we provided the client with over 30 actionable strategies and tactics for improving the country’s competitiveness in terms of improved clinical trial infrastructure, increased efficiency, attractiveness of the regulatory system and international marketing/public relations efforts.
Results Our client shared the analysis and strategic recommendations with their funding partners in key government agencies. The results of this project are serving as a leading component of the country’s clinical trial infrastructure development plans.
ProjectQuality-of-Life Claims Analysis Client Top 10 Multinational Pharmaceutical Manufacturer
Description As a point of competitive differentiation, our client sought to include quality-of-life improvements as a component of their marketing program. To do this, it was necessary to provide sufficient evidence for inclusion of these claims on the product prescribing label.
VOI identified FDA and EMEA policies for inclusion of quality-of-life marketing claims, analyzed violation notices and promotional materials to determine triggers of regulatory sanctions and recommended clinical trial design and endpoints to ensure approval of marketing claims.
Results Our client incorporated our recommendations into the design of their late-stage clinical trials and was successful in obtaining regulatory approval for the necessary product labeling.
ProjectComparative Claims Analysis Client Top 10 Multinational Pharmaceutical Manufacturer
Description Similar to the Quality-of-Life Claims analysis but for a different pipeline product, the same client wanted to include superiority claims against an existing product as part of their marketing effort. To do this, it was necessary to provide sufficient evidence for inclusion of these claims on the product prescribing label.
VOI identified FDA and EMEA policies for inclusion of comparative claims, analyzed violation notices and promotional materials to determine triggers of regulatory sanctions and recommended clinical trial design and endpoints to ensure approval of marketing claims.
Results Our client incorporated our recommendations into the design of their clinical trials. This product is under regulatory review, but we expect that the comparative claims labeling will be granted.
|